This paper is meant to help new users get started on the UNIXoperating system. It includes:
From the user's point of view, the UNIX operating system is easy to learn and use, and presents few of the usual impediments to getting the job done. It is hard, however, for the beginner to know where to start, and how to make the best use of the facilities available. The purpose of this introduction is to help new users get used to the main ideas of the UNIX system and start making effective use of it quickly.
You should have a couple of other documents with you for easy reference as you read this one. The most important is The UNIX Programmer's Manual; it's often easier to tell you to read about something in the manual than to repeat its contents here. The other useful document is A Tutorial Introduction to the UNIX Text Editor, which will tell you how to use the editor to get text -- programs, data, documents -- into the computer.
A word of warning: the UNIX system has become quite popular, and there are several major variants in widespread use. Of course details also change with time. So although the basic structure of UNIX and how to use it is common to all versions, there will certainly be a few things which are different on your system from what is described here. We have tried to minimize the problem, but be aware of it. In cases of doubt, this paper describes Version 7 UNIX.
This paper has five sections:
You must have a UNIX login name, which you can get from whoever administers your system. You also need to know the phone number, unless your system uses permanently connected terminals. The UNIX system is capable of dealing with a wide variety of terminals: Terminet 300's; Execuport, TI and similar portables; video (CRT) terminals like the HP2640, etc.; high-priced graphics terminals like the Tektronix 4014; plotting terminals like those from GSI and DASI; and even the venerable Teletype in its various forms. But note: UNIX is strongly oriented towards devices with lower case. If your terminal produces only upper case (e.g., model 33 Teletype, some video and portable terminals), life will be so difficult that you should look for another terminal.
Be sure to set the switches appropriately on your device. Switches that might need to be adjusted include the speed, upper/lower case mode, full duplex, even parity, and any others that local wisdom advises. Establish a connection using whatever magic is needed for your terminal; this may involve dialing a telephone call or merely flipping a switch. In either case, UNIX should type ``login:'' at you. If it types garbage, you may be at the wrong speed; check the switches. If that fails, push the ``break'' or ``interrupt'' key a few times, slowly. If that fails to produce a login message, consult a guru.
When you get a login: message, type your login name in lower case. Follow it by a RETURN; the system will not do anything until you type a RETURN. If a password is required, you will be asked for it, and (if possible) printing will be turned off while you type it. Don't forget RETURN.
The culmination of your login efforts is a ``prompt character,'' a single character that indicates that the system is ready to accept commands from you. The prompt character is usually a dollar sign $ or a percent sign %. (You may also get a message of the day just before the prompt character, or a notification that you have mail.)
Once you've seen the prompt character, you can type commands, which are requests that the system do something. Try typing
Another command you might try is who, which tells you everyone who is currently logged in:
If you make a mistake typing the command name, and refer to a non-existent command, you will be told. For example, if you type
Sometimes you can get into a state where your terminal acts strangely. For example, each letter may be typed twice, or the RETURN may not cause a line feed or a return to the left margin. You can often fix this by logging out and logging back in. Or you can read the description of the command stty in section I of the manual. To get intelligent treatment of tab characters (which are much used in UNIX) if your terminal doesn't have tabs, type the command
If you make a typing mistake, and see it before RETURN has been typed, there are two ways to recover. The sharp-character # erases the last character typed; in fact successive uses of # erase characters back to the beginning of the line (but not beyond). So if you type badly, you can correct as you go:
The at-sign @ erases all of the characters typed so far on the current input line, so if the line is irretrievably fouled up, type an @ and start the line over.
What if you must enter a sharp or at-sign as part of the text? If you precede either # or @ by a backslash \, it loses its erase meaning. So to enter a sharp or at-sign in something, type \# or \@. The system will always echo a newline at you after your at-sign, even if preceded by a backslash. Don't worry -- the at-sign has been recorded.
To erase a backslash, you have to type two sharps or two at-signs, as in \##. The backslash is used extensively in UNIX to indicate that the following character is in some way special.
UNIX has full read-ahead, which means that you can type as fast as you want, whenever you want, even when some command is typing at you. If you type during output, your input characters will appear intermixed with the output characters, but they will be stored away and interpreted in the correct order. So you can type several commands one after another without waiting for the first to finish or even begin.
You can stop most programs by typing the character ``DEL'' (perhaps called ``delete'' or ``rubout'' on your terminal). The ``interrupt'' or ``break'' key found on most terminals can also be used. In a few programs, like the text editor, DEL stops whatever the program is doing but leaves you in that program. Hanging up the phone will stop most programs.
The easiest way to log out is to hang up the phone. You can also type
When you log in, you may sometimes get the message
How do you send mail to someone else? Suppose it is to go to ``joe'' (assuming ``joe'' is someone's login name). The easiest way is this:
For practice, send mail to yourself. (This isn't as strange as it might sound -- mail to oneself is a handy reminder mechanism.)
There are other ways to send mail -- you can send a previously prepared letter, and you can mail to a number of people all at once. For more details see mail(1). (The notation mail(1) means the command mail in section 1 of the UNIX Programmer's Manual.)
At some point, out of the blue will come a message like
A protocol is needed to keep what you type from getting garbled up with what Joe types. Typically it's like this:
If you write to someone who isn't logged in, or who doesn't want to be disturbed, you'll be told. If the target is logged in but doesn't answer after a decent interval, simply type ``control-d''.
The UNIX Programmer's Manual is typically kept on-line. If you get stuck on something, and can't find an expert to assist you, you can print on your terminal some manual section that might help. This is also useful for getting the most up-to-date information on a command. To print a manual section, type ``man command-name''. Thus to read up on the who command, type
Your UNIX system may have available a program called learn, which provides computer aided instruction on the file system and basic commands, the editor, document preparation, and even C programming. Try typing the command
If you have to type a paper or a letter or a program, how do you get the information stored in the machine? Most of these tasks are done with the UNIX ``text editor'' ed. Since ed is thoroughly documented in ed(1) and explained in A Tutorial Introduction to the UNIX Text Editor, we won't spend any time here describing how to use it. All we want it for right now is to make some files. (A file is just a collection of information stored in the machine, a simplistic but adequate definition.)
To create a file called junk with some text in it, do the following:
At this point you can do various editing operations on the text you typed in, such as correcting spelling mistakes, rearranging paragraphs and the like. Finally, you must write the information you have typed into a file with the editor command w:
Until the w command, nothing is stored permanently, so if you hang up and go home the information is lost.** But after w the information is there permanently; you can re-access it any time by typing
Now create a second file called temp in the same manner. You should now have two files, junk and temp.
The ls (for ``list'') command lists the names (not contents) of any of the files that UNIX knows about. If you type
Options can be combined: ls -lt gives the same thing as ls -l, but sorted into time order. You can also name the files you're interested in, and ls will list the information about them only. More details can be found in ls(1).
The use of optional arguments that begin with a minus sign, like -t and -lt, is a common convention for UNIX programs. In general, if a program accepts such optional arguments, they precede any filename arguments. It is also vital that you separate the various arguments with spaces: ls-l is not the same as ls -l.
Now that you've got a file of text, how do you print it so people can look at it? There are a host of programs that do that, probably more than are needed.
One simple thing is to use the editor, since printing is often done just before making changes anyway. You can say
There are times when it's not feasible to use the editor for printing. For example, there is a limit on how big a file ed can handle (several thousand lines). Secondly, it will only print one file at a time, and sometimes you want to print several, one after another. So here are a couple of alternatives.
First is cat, the simplest of all the printing programs. cat simply prints on the terminal the contents of all the files named in a list. Thus
pr produces formatted printouts of files. As with cat, pr prints all the files named in a list. The difference is that it produces headings with date, time, page number and file name at the top of each page, and extra lines to skip over the fold in the paper. Thus,
pr can also produce multi-column output:
It should be noted that pr is not a formatting program in the sense of shuffling lines around and justifying margins. The true formatters are nroff and troff, which we will get to in the section on document preparation.
There are also programs that print files on a high-speed printer. Look in your manual under opr and lpr. Which to use depends on what equipment is attached to your machine.
Now that you have some files in the file system and some experience in printing them, you can try bigger things. For example, you can move a file from one place to another (which amounts to giving it a new name), like this:
If you want to make a copy of a file (that is, to have two versions of something), you can use the cp command:
Finally, when you get tired of creating and moving files, there is a command to remove files from the file system, called rm.
You will get a warning message if one of the named files wasn't there, but otherwise rm, like most UNIX commands, does its work silently. There is no prompting or chatter, and error messages are occasionally curt. This terseness is sometimes disconcerting to newcomers, but experienced users find it desirable.
So far we have used filenames without ever saying what's a legal name, so it's time for a couple of rules. First, filenames are limited to 14 characters, which is enough to be descriptive. Second, although you can use almost any character in a filename, common sense says you should stick to ones that are visible, and that you should probably avoid characters that might be used with other meanings. We have already seen, for example, that in the ls command, ls -t means to list in time order. So if you had a file whose name was -t, you would have a tough time listing it by name. Besides the minus sign, there are other characters which have special meaning. To avoid pitfalls, you would do well to use only letters, numbers and the period until you're familiar with the situation.
On to some more positive suggestions. Suppose you're typing a large document like a book. Logically this divides into many small pieces, like chapters and perhaps sections. Physically it must be divided too, for ed will not handle really big files. Thus you should type the document as a number of files. You might have a separate file for each chapter, called
There are advantages to a systematic naming convention which are not obvious to the novice UNIX user. What if you wanted to print the whole book? You could say
This shorthand notation is not a property of the pr command, by the way. It is system-wide, a service of the program that interprets commands (the ``shell,'' sh(1)). Using that fact, you can see how to list the names of the files in the book:
The * is not the only pattern-matching feature available. Suppose you want to print only chapters 1 through 4 and 9. Then you can say
The ? pattern matches any single character, so
Of these niceties, * is certainly the most useful, and you should get used to it. The others are frills, but worth knowing.
If you should ever have to turn off the special meaning of *, ?, etc., enclose the entire argument in single quotes, as in
When you first made that file called junk, how did the system know that there wasn't another junk somewhere else, especially since the person in the next office is also reading this tutorial? The answer is that generally each user has a private directory, which contains only the files that belong to him. When you log in, you are ``in'' your directory. Unless you take special action, when you create a new file, it is made in the directory that you are currently in; this is most often your own directory, and thus the file is unrelated to any other file of the same name that might exist in someone else's directory.
The set of all files is organized into a (usually big) tree, with your files located several branches into the tree. It is possible for you to ``walk'' around this tree, and to find any file in the system, by starting at the root of the tree and walking along the proper set of branches. Conversely, you can start where you are and walk toward the root.
Let's try the latter first. The basic tools is the command pwd (``print working directory''), which prints the name of the directory you are currently in.
Although the details will vary according to the system you are on, if you give the command pwd, it will print something like
If you now type
Next, try
The next step is to try
Now try
Here is a picture which may make this clearer:
Notice that Mary's junk is unrelated to Eve's.
This isn't too exciting if all the files of interest are in your own directory, but if you work with someone else or on several projects concurrently, it becomes handy indeed. For example, your friends can print your book by saying
If your neighbor doesn't want you poking around in his files, or vice versa, privacy can be arranged. Each file and directory has read-write-execute permissions for the owner, a group, and everyone else, which can be set to control access. See ls(1) and chmod(1) for details. As a matter of observed fact, most users most of the time find openness of more benefit than privacy.
As a final experiment with pathnames, try
What if you work regularly with someone else on common information in his directory? You could just log in as your friend each time you want to, but you can also say ``I want to work on his files instead of my own''. This is done by changing the directory that you are currently in:
It is usually convenient to arrange your own files so that all the files related to one thing are in a directory separate from other projects. For example, when you write your book, you might want to keep all the text in a directory called book. So make one with
You can go up one level in the tree of files by saying
Most of the commands we have seen so far produce output on the terminal; some, like the editor, also take their input from the terminal. It is universal in UNIX systems that the terminal can be replaced by a file for either or both of input and output. As one example,
The symbol >> operates very much like > does, except that it means ``add to the end of.'' That is,
In a similar way, the symbol < means to take the input for a program from the following file, instead of from the terminal. Thus, you could make up a script of commonly used editing commands and put them into a file called script. Then you can run the script on a file by saying
One of the novel contributions of the UNIX system is the idea of a pipe. A pipe is simply a way to connect the output of one program to the input of another program, so the two run as a sequence of processes -- a pipeline.
For example,
There are many other examples of pipes. For example,
Any program that reads from the terminal can read from a pipe instead; any program that writes on the terminal can drive a pipe. You can have as many elements in a pipeline as you wish.
Many UNIX programs are written so that they will take their input from one or more files if file arguments are given; if no arguments are given they will read from the terminal, and thus can be used in pipelines. pr is one example:
We have already mentioned once or twice the mysterious ``shell,'' which is in fact sh(1). The shell is the program that interprets what you type as commands and arguments. It also looks after translating *, etc., into lists of filenames, and <, >, and | into changes of input and output streams.
The shell has other capabilities too. For example, you can run two programs with one command line by separating the commands with a semicolon; the shell recognizes the semicolon and breaks the line into two commands. Thus
You can also have more than one program running simultaneously if you wish. For example, if you are doing something time-consuming, like the editor script of an earlier section, and you don't want to wait around for the results before starting something else, you can say
When you initiate a command with &, the system replies with a number called the process number, which identifies the command in case you later want to stop it. If you do, you can say
You can say
Just as you can tell the editor or some similar program to take its input from a file instead of from the terminal, you can tell the shell to read a file to get commands. (Why not? The shell, after all, is just a program, albeit a clever one.) For instance, suppose you want to set tabs on your terminal, and find out the date and who's on the system every time you log in. Then you can put the three necessary commands (tabs, date, who) into a file, let's call it startup, and then run it with
If this is to be a regular thing, you can eliminate the need to type sh: simply type, once only, the command
If you want startup to run automatically every time you log in, create a file in your login directory called .profile, and place in it the line startup. When the shell first gains control when you log in, it looks for the .profile file and does whatever commands it finds in it. We'll get back to the shell in the section on programming.
UNIX systems are used extensively for document preparation. There are two major formatting programs, that is, programs that produce a text with justified right margins, automatic page numbering and titling, automatic hyphenation, and the like. nroff is designed to produce output on terminals and line-printers. troff (pronounced ``tee-roff'') instead drives a phototypesetter, which produces very high quality output on photographic paper. This paper was formatted with troff.
The basic idea of nroff and troff is that the text to be formatted contains within it ``formatting commands'' that indicate in detail how the formatted text is to look. For example, there might be commands that specify how long lines are, whether to use single or double spacing, and what running titles to use on each page.
Because nroff and troff are relatively hard to learn to use effectively, several ``packages'' of canned formatting requests are available to let you specify paragraphs, running titles, footnotes, multi-column output, and so on, with little effort and without having to learn nroff and troff. These packages take a modest effort to learn, but the rewards for using them are so great that it is time well spent.
In this section, we will provide a hasty look at the ``manuscript'' package known as -ms. Formatting requests typically consist of a period and two upper-case letters, such as .TL, which is used to introduce a title, or .PP to begin a new paragraph.
A document is typed so it looks something like this:
To actually produce a document in standard format using -ms, use the command
There are several similar packages; check with a local expert to determine which ones are in common use on your machine.
In addition to the basic formatters, there is a host of supporting programs that help with document preparation. The list in the next few paragraphs is far from complete, so browse through the manual and check with people around you for other possibilities.
eqn and neqn let you integrate mathematics into the text of a document, in an easy-to-learn language that closely resembles the way you would speak it aloud. For example, the eqn input
The program tbl provides an analogous service for preparing tabular material; it does all the computations necessary to align complicated columns with elements of varying widths.
refer prepares bibliographic citations from a data base, in whatever style is defined by the formatting package. It looks after all the details of numbering references in sequence, filling in page and volume numbers, getting the author's initials and the journal name right, and so on.
spell and typo detect possible spelling mistakes in a document. spell works by comparing the words in your document to a dictionary, printing those that are not in the dictionary. It knows enough about English spelling to detect plurals and the like, so it does a very good job. typo looks for words which are ``unusual'', and prints those. Spelling mistakes tend to be more unusual, and thus show up early when the most unusual words are printed first.
grep looks through a set of files for lines that contain a particular text pattern (rather like the editor's context search does, but on a bunch of files). For example,
diff prints a list of the differences between two files, so you can compare two versions of something automatically (which certainly beats proofreading by hand).
wc counts the words, lines and characters in a set of files. tr translates characters into other characters; for example it will convert upper to lower case and vice versa. This translates upper into lower:
sort sorts files in a variety of ways; cref makes cross-references; ptx makes a permuted index (keyword-in-context listing). sed provides many of the editing facilities of ed, but can apply them to arbitrarily long inputs. awk provides the ability to do both pattern matching and numeric computations, and to conveniently process fields within lines. These programs are for more advanced users, and they are not limited to document preparation. Put them on your list of things to learn about.
Most of these programs are either independently documented (like eqn and tbl), or are sufficiently simple that the description in the UNIX Programmer's Manual is adequate explanation.
Most documents go through several versions (always more than you expected) before they are finally finished. Accordingly, you should do whatever possible to make the job of changing them easy.
First, when you do the purely mechanical operations of typing, type so that subsequent editing will be easy. Start each sentence on a new line. Make lines short, and break lines at natural places, such as after commas and semicolons, rather than randomly. Since most people change documents by rewriting phrases and adding, deleting and rearranging sentences, these precautions simplify any editing you have to do later.
Keep the individual files of a document down to modest size, perhaps ten to fifteen thousand characters. Larger files edit more slowly, and of course if you make a dumb mistake it's better to have clobbered a small file than a big one. Split into files at natural boundaries in the document, for the same reasons that you start each sentence on a new line.
The second aspect of making change easy is to not commit yourself to formatting details too early. One of the advantages of formatting packages like -ms is that they permit you to delay decisions to the last possible moment. Indeed, until a document is printed, it is not even decided whether it will be typeset or put on a line printer.
As a rule of thumb, for all but the most trivial jobs, you should type a document in terms of a set of requests like .PP, and then define them appropriately, either by using one of the canned packages (the better way) or by defining your own nroff and troff commands. As long as you have entered the text in some systematic way, it can always be cleaned up and re-formatted by a judicious combination of editing commands and request definitions.
There will be no attempt made to teach any of the programming languages available but a few words of advice are in order. One of the reasons why the UNIX system is a productive programming environment is that there is already a rich set of tools available, and facilities like pipes, I/O redirection, and the capabilities of the shell often make it possible to do a job by pasting together programs that already exist instead of writing from scratch.
The pipe mechanism lets you fabricate quite complicated operations out of spare parts that already exist. For example, the first draft of the spell program was (roughly)
The editor can be made to do things that would normally require special programs on other systems. For example, to list the first and last lines of each of a set of files, such as a book, you could laboriously type
An option often overlooked by newcomers is that the shell is itself a programming language, with variables, control flow (if-else, while, for, case), subroutines, and interrupt handling. Since there are many building-block programs, you can sometimes avoid writing a new program merely by piecing together some of the building blocks with shell command files.
We will not go into any details here; examples and rules can be found in An Introduction to the UNIX Shell, by S. R. Bourne.
If you are undertaking anything substantial, C is the only reasonable choice of programming language: everything in the UNIX system is tuned to it. The system itself is written in C, as are most of the programs that run on it. It is also a easy language to use once you get started. C is introduced and fully described in The C Programming Language by B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie (Prentice-Hall, 1978). Several sections of the manual describe the system interfaces, that is, how you do I/O and similar functions. Read UNIX Programming for more complicated things.
Most input and output in C is best handled with the standard I/O library, which provides a set of I/O functions that exist in compatible form on most machines that have C compilers. In general, it's wisest to confine the system interactions in a program to the facilities provided by this library.
C programs that don't depend too much on special features of UNIX (such as pipes) can be moved to other computers that have C compilers. The list of such machines grows daily; in addition to the original PDP-11, it currently includes at least Honeywell 6000, IBM 370, Interdata 8/32, Data General Nova and Eclipse, HP 2100, Harris /7, VAX 11/780, SEL 86, and Zilog Z80. Calls to the standard I/O library will work on all of these machines.
There are a number of supporting programs that go with C. lint checks C programs for potential portability problems, and detects errors such as mismatched argument types and uninitialized variables.
For larger programs (anything whose source is on more than one file) make allows you to specify the dependencies among the source files and the processing steps needed to make a new version; it then checks the times that the pieces were last changed and does the minimal amount of recompiling to create a consistent updated version.
The debugger adb is useful for digging through the dead bodies of C programs, but is rather hard to learn to use effectively. The most effective debugging tool is still careful thought, coupled with judiciously placed print statements.
The C compiler provides a limited instrumentation service, so you can find out where programs spend their time and what parts are worth optimizing. Compile the routines with the -p option; after the test run, use prof to print an execution profile. The command time will give you the gross run-time statistics of a program, but they are not super accurate or reproducible.
If you have to use Fortran, there are two possibilities. You might consider Ratfor, which gives you the decent control structures and free-form input that characterize C, yet lets you write code that is still portable to other environments. Bear in mind that UNIX Fortran tends to produce large and relatively slow-running programs. Furthermore, supporting software like adb, prof, etc., are all virtually useless with Fortran programs. There may also be a Fortran 77 compiler on your system. If so, this is a viable alternative to Ratfor, and has the non-trivial advantage that it is compatible with C and related programs. (The Ratfor processor and C tools can be used with Fortran 77 too.)
If your application requires you to translate a language into a set of actions or another language, you are in effect building a compiler, though probably a small one. In that case, you should be using the yacc compiler-compiler, which helps you develop a compiler quickly. The lex lexical analyzer generator does the same job for the simpler languages that can be expressed as regular expressions. It can be used by itself, or as a front end to recognize inputs for a yacc-based program. Both yacc and lex require some sophistication to use, but the initial effort of learning them can be repaid many times over in programs that are easy to change later on.
Most UNIX systems also make available other languages, such as Algol 68, APL, Basic, Lisp, Pascal, and Snobol. Whether these are useful depends largely on the local environment: if someone cares about the language and has worked on it, it may be in good shape. If not, the odds are strong that it will be more trouble than it's worth.
K. L. Thompson and D. M. Ritchie, The UNIX Programmer's Manual, Bell Laboratories, 1978. Lists commands, system routines and interfaces, file formats, and some of the maintenance procedures. You can't live without this, although you will probably only need to read section 1.
Documents for Use with the UNIX Time-sharing System. Volume 2 of the Programmer's Manual. This contains more extensive descriptions of major commands, and tutorials and reference manuals. All of the papers listed below are in it, as are descriptions of most of the programs mentioned above.
D. M. Ritchie and K. L. Thompson, ``The UNIX Time-sharing System,'' CACM, July 1974. An overview of the system, for people interested in operating systems. Worth reading by anyone who programs. Contains a remarkable number of one-sentence observations on how to do things right.
The Bell System Technical Journal (BSTJ) Special Issue on UNIX, July/August, 1978, contains many papers describing recent developments, and some retrospective material.
The 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering (October, 1976) contains several papers describing the use of the Programmer's Workbench (PWB) version of UNIX.
B. W. Kernighan, ``A Tutorial Introduction to the UNIX Text Editor'' and ``Advanced Editing on UNIX,'' Bell Laboratories, 1978. Beginners need the introduction; the advanced material will help you get the most out of the editor.
M. E. Lesk, ``Typing Documents on UNIX,'' Bell Laboratories, 1978. Describes the -ms macro package, which isolates the novice from the vagaries of nroff and troff, and takes care of most formatting situations. If this specific package isn't available on your system, something similar probably is. The most likely alternative is the PWB/UNIX macro package -mm; see your local guru if you use PWB/UNIX.
B. W. Kernighan and L. L. Cherry, ``A System for Typesetting Mathematics,'' Bell Laboratories Computing Science Tech. Rep. 17.
M. E. Lesk, ``Tbl -- A Program to Format Tables,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 49, 1976.
J. F. Ossanna, Jr., ``NROFF/TROFF User's Manual,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 54, 1976. troff is the basic formatter used by -ms, eqn and tbl. The reference manual is indispensable if you are going to write or maintain these or similar programs. But start with:
B. W. Kernighan, ``A TROFF Tutorial,'' Bell Laboratories, 1976. An attempt to unravel the intricacies of troff.
B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, The C Programming Language, Prentice-Hall, 1978. Contains a tutorial introduction, complete discussions of all language features, and the reference manual.
B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, ``UNIX Programming,'' Bell Laboratories, 1978. Describes how to interface with the system from C programs: I/O calls, signals, processes.
S. R. Bourne, ``An Introduction to the UNIX Shell,'' Bell Laboratories, 1978. An introduction and reference manual for the Version 7 shell. Mandatory reading if you intend to make effective use of the programming power of this shell.
S. C. Johnson, ``Yacc -- Yet Another Compiler-Compiler,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 32, 1978.
M. E. Lesk, ``Lex -- A Lexical Analyzer Generator,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 39, 1975.
S. C. Johnson, ``Lint, a C Program Checker,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 65, 1977.
S. I. Feldman, ``MAKE -- A Program for Maintaining Computer Programs,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 57, 1977.
J. F. Maranzano and S. R. Bourne, ``A Tutorial Introduction to ADB,'' Bell Laboratories CSTR 62, 1977. An introduction to a powerful but complex debugging tool.
S. I. Feldman and P. J. Weinberger, ``A Portable Fortran 77 Compiler,'' Bell Laboratories, 1978. A full Fortran 77 for UNIX systems.